There was, and there is, a Tortora case (we talked about it here for the Bellocchio series), and there is a Garlasco case. The death of Chiara Poggi, struck with a conquering body on the morning of August 13, 2007 in her house in Garlasco, remains beyond official judgments a chaos with respect to an accepted and acceptable truth for all. For that terrible crime he was definitively condemned, after a trial however with several twists of scene (two absolutions), his fiancé Alberto Stasi. 16 years, from 2025 in semi-freedom.
And always in 2025 the case was reopened, by the will of the Procura di Pavia, with a new investigation, Andrea Sempio, after new analysis on the DNA found under the nails of the victim. Since then there is no network in Italy, small, large or medium, generalist, local, satellite, web and podcast, which does not take care of this crime. An obsession h24 concerning a whole country, was a case from Var in the derby of Italy Inter-Juve. I say this without wanting to lack respect to those who suffer, family and protagonists.
These dramatic stories lead to so many traumas but they also bring so many listening. From a country of coaches we have become a country of criminologists or otherwise of black experts. As with Covid, the lawyers took the place of the virologists and impervert from morning to night everywhere. Someone’s splitting up, too.
Like Tortora, Garlasco is also a political and pope case, such as Tortora, in the discussion that is getting fugue for the referendum on justice on 22 and 23 March. We’re not going to sit here with forensic genetics and stains on the walls, but the question is: did the truth machine work in this story or not? Certainly, if one thinks that there is a definitive condemnation, certainly no if one thinks that authoritative journalists have repeatedly written that Stasi was in prison not beyond any reasonable doubt.
And Sempio? Why was he investigated and prosecuted at the time and why is he now back on stage with 18 years of delay compared to the crime? And the new science of investigation, the language of the crime scene? Many things, many contaminated, others ignored or ruined, other ambigues. In short, chaos. Wasn’t it said once the first 48 hours were essential? What about the rest? Scontrini, alibi, sanctuaries, sex, suspects, who puts more of it.
Was the work of the magistrates always perfect? Has anyone covered or discovered? In short, justice once again lends itself to a discussion. The mistake is to make ideological discussion, but the discussion must remain in the cradle of democracy. The citizen is entitled to a fair trial and the families of the victims are entitled to a truth. The guilty who are not guilty are entitled to a compensation and the guilty still uncultivated must pay. I say it as a pattern, without putting names. And who’s wrong, I’m talking about magistrates, you have to pay. Do not make careers as in other cases. Only in this way does democracy find a sense and citizens find a sense of being in a democracy.
L’articolo Garlasco e giustizia proviene da IlNewyorkese.
