ROMA (ITALPRESS) – Those of Giusi Bartolozzi are “observations that perhaps in an informal conversation, in the vivacity of the moment, go beyond what is the meaning that one would like to give to expressions”. Thus the Minister of Justice, Carlo Nordio, guest at “Realpolitik” aired this evening on Rete4. “How can one think that a magistrate, which for another depends on a Justice Minister who has been magistrate for 40 years, would in fact eliminate the judiciary or consider it a firing squad? We’re in a very blind electoral campaign and we’re all told otherwise. Rightly the head of the state said to lower the tones and I tried to do it from the first moment, but unfortunately not always these tones are lowering”, he added.
For Minister Bartolozzi “is a chief Cabinet of great experience that has accumulated political experience with the experience of magistrate, has always been extremely faithful and laborious. The resignations are demanded for much more serious reasons than what could have been, as it was, a voice from the sen escaped. It has already been made a statement where we were aware of this error, she herself said very regretted, I believe that the thing should end here”, concluded Nordio.
If the referendum had to win the no “I would certainly not think about resignations, they would not even be institutionally correct, much more than this law was passed by Parliament in overwhelming majority. So, although I am proud of the paternity, since I have been supporting it for 30 years, the resignation of a minister depends on completely different factors.” The day after the eventual victory of the no “I would go to the serene office, but happy not, because I would be aware that this reform has been affected, for several years we will no longer be able to make a modern, liberal reform, which aligns with the other European democracies”, he added.
It is necessary to vote yes to the referendum “to have a judge absolutely impartial and third with respect to those who carry the accused in front of the court and to have a court of disciplinary justice that finally pay the wrong judges the mistakes they sometimes make,” he concludes.
– photo IPA Agency –
(ITALPRESS).
